The mystery of Atlantis has been shrouded in speculation for ages. Described by the Greek philosopher Plato in his dialogues “Timaeus” and “Critias,” Atlantis was said to be a powerful and advanced civilization that ultimately fell out of favor with the gods and was submerged beneath the sea in a single day and night of catastrophic destruction. While the exact location of Atlantis remains a subject of debate, the Eye of the Sahara has emerged as a potential candidate.
The Eye of the Sahara, located in Mauritania, West Africa, is a massive circular formation that spans over 30 miles in diameter and stands out as a unique and enigmatic geological feature. Its concentric rings, prominent ridges, and circular shape bear a striking resemblance to Plato’s description of Atlantis as a series of circular rings of water and land. This has led some researchers to speculate that the Eye of the Sahara could be the remnants of the lost city of Atlantis.
Geological and Historical Evidence One of the key pieces of evidence in favor of the Eye of the Sahara as Atlantis is its geology. Geological studies of the Eye of the Sahara have revealed that the circular rings and ridges are consistent with patterns of uplift and erosion, suggesting that they could be the remnants of ancient walls, canals, and buildings. This supports the idea that the Eye of the Sahara was once a flourishing city that was swallowed by the sea.
Furthermore, the location of the Eye of the Sahara fits Plato’s description of Atlantis as being located “beyond the pillars of Hercules,” which is believed to refer to the modern-day Strait of Gibraltar. Mauritania, where the Eye of the Sahara is located, is indeed beyond the Strait of Gibraltar, making it a plausible location for Atlantis according to Plato’s account.
There are also historical and cultural connections that add to the intrigue of the theory. Local Mauritanian folklore includes tales of a lost city or civilization that existed in the region, which could be interpreted as echoes of the Atlantis story. These cultural connections provide additional support to the theory of the Eye of the Sahara as Atlantis.
Counterarguments and Conclusion As with any historical or archaeological theory, there are counterarguments and criticisms to consider. Some skeptics argue that the geological features of the Eye of the Sahara can be explained by natural processes, and that there is no conclusive evidence of man-made structures. Others maintain that Atlantis was purely a fictional story created by Plato, and there is no actual city or civilization that corresponds to his description.
However, despite the skepticism, the theory of the Eye of the Sahara as Atlantis continues to generate interest and intrigue among researchers and enthusiasts alike. The unique geological features, the alignment with Plato’s description of Atlantis, and the historical and cultural connections all make it a compelling possibility.